Zakir Naik’s organization Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) on Friday approached the Delhi High Court against a tribunal’s order which had upheld the central government’s decision to ban it under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.

Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal recused herself from hearing the matter and posted it for July 27 before another bench.

Saying there were sufficient reasons and cause to declare IRF an unlawful association, a special tribunal headed by Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal of Delhi High Court on May 11 had upheld the November 17, 2016, notification banning IRF for five years.

Filing an appeal against tribunal’s order, the IRF sought setting aside of tribunal’s May 11 order, arguing that actions are done by individuals named in the FIRs – Naik and his aide Arshi Qureshi – cannot reflect on the organization.

The ban will affect the charitable and educational work being done by IRF, said the plea, adding that FIRs were based on speeches allegedly made by Naik years before the charges were raised.

On March 16, a single judge bench of the High Court had also dismissed IRF’s plea against the Central government’s decision to immediately ban the organization, saying immediate action appears to have been taken in “interest of sovereignty, integrity, and maintenance of public order”.

On November 17, 2016, the Union home ministry imposed an immediate ban on the organization under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.

The Central government had produced before the court the relevant documents, based on which the decision to ban IRF was made, and said the need for taking “urgent step” was felt in view of the apprehension that Indian youth could be “radicalised” or “motivated” to join terror groups like Islamic State by the alleged statements and speeches made by the organisation and its members, including its President, Naik.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here